Detailed Information

Cited 0 time in webofscience Cited 0 time in scopus
Metadata Downloads

Experimental evaluation and simulation of a variable refrigerant- flow (VRF) air-conditioning system with outdoor air processing unit

Authors
Park, Doo YongYun, GyeongKim, Kang Soo
Issue Date
1-7월-2017
Publisher
ELSEVIER SCIENCE SA
Keywords
Variable refrigerant flow heat pump; Field performance measurement; EnergyPlus; Validation; Dedicated outdoor air system; Thermal comfort
Citation
ENERGY AND BUILDINGS, v.146, pp.122 - 140
Indexed
SCIE
SCOPUS
Journal Title
ENERGY AND BUILDINGS
Volume
146
Start Page
122
End Page
140
URI
https://scholar.korea.ac.kr/handle/2021.sw.korea/82868
DOI
10.1016/j.enbuild.2017.04.026
ISSN
0378-7788
Abstract
Variable refrigerant flow (VRF) refers to the ability of an air-conditioning (AC) system to control the amount of refrigerant flowing to the multiple evaporators (indoor units). This study compares the actual energy use of a building, equipped with a VRF system with simulation results obtained using EnergyPlus. Also, the aim of this study is to analyze the performance related to energy and thermal comfort when the VRF system without ventilation is replaced with the VRF system with the energy recovery ventilation (ERV) or VRF system with the dedicated outside air system (DOAS). The measured power use of the VRF system is very similar to the simulated power use of the VRF system. The mean value of the difference between simulation and measured data in monthly power use in summer and winter was 3.3% and 3.6%, respectively. The yearly energy use of the VRF system without ventilation is found to be 213.6 kWh/m(2) a. The VRF system with ERV in case 4 and the VRF system with DOAS in case 8 are found to be 16.8% and 26.0% higher than the VRF system without ventilation, respectively. Through the entire year, it was found that 17.2% of indoor air condition data provided by the VRF system without ventilation in the winter and 16.2% of the data in the summer fall within the ASHRAE winter and summer comfort zones. In order to improve the thermal comfort, the setpoint temperature in winter needs to be increased and the humidity in summer needs to be reduced. On the other hand, it was found that 93.9% of indoor air condition data provided by the VRF system with DOAS in the winter and 83.8% of the data in the summer fall within the ASHRAE winter and summer comfort zones. When the VRF system without ventilation is replaced with the VRF system with DOAS, the thermal comfort percentage is improved during the winter and summer by 76.7% and 67.6%, respectively. (C) 2017 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
Files in This Item
There are no files associated with this item.
Appears in
Collections
College of Engineering > Department of Architecture > 1. Journal Articles

qrcode

Items in ScholarWorks are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.

Altmetrics

Total Views & Downloads

BROWSE