Detailed Information

Cited 0 time in webofscience Cited 0 time in scopus
Metadata Downloads

Randomized Phase III Study of Docetaxel Plus Cisplatin Versus Pemetrexed Plus Cisplatin as First-line Treatment of Nonsquamous Non-Small-cell Lung Cancer: A TRAIL Trial

Authors
Park, Cheol-KyuOh, In-JaeKim, Kyu-SikChoi, Yoo-DukJang, Tae-WonKim, Youn-SeupLee, Kwan-HoShin, Kyeong-CheolJung, Chi YoungYang, Sei-HoonRyu, Jeong-SeonJang, Seung-HunYoo, Seung-SooYong, Suk-JoongLee, Kye YoungIn, Kwang-HoLee, Min-KiKim, Young-Chul
Issue Date
7월-2017
Publisher
CIG MEDIA GROUP, LP
Keywords
Chemotherapy; Drug toxicity; East Asia; Progression-free survival; Treatment efficacy
Citation
CLINICAL LUNG CANCER, v.18, no.4, pp.E289 - E296
Indexed
SCIE
SCOPUS
Journal Title
CLINICAL LUNG CANCER
Volume
18
Number
4
Start Page
E289
End Page
E296
URI
https://scholar.korea.ac.kr/handle/2021.sw.korea/82935
DOI
10.1016/j.cllc.2017.01.002
ISSN
1525-7304
Abstract
No prospective phase III trials have directly compared the efficacy of pemetrexed plus cisplatin (Pem-Cis) with docetaxel plus cisplatin (Doc-Cis) in nonsquamous non-small-cell lung cancer. A total of 148 chemotherapynaive patients lacking driver mutations were randomized to the Pem-Cis or Doc-Cis arm. The progression-free survival and response rate was similar between the 2 arms, although adverse events and more severe toxicities were observed more frequently in the Doc-Cis arm. Introduction: To date, no prospective phase III trials have directly compared the efficacy of pemetrexed plus cisplatin (PemCis) with docetaxel plus cisplatin (Doc-Cis) in patients with nonsquamous non-small-cell lung cancer. Materials and Methods: A total of 148 chemotherapy-naive patients lacking driver mutations were randomized into 21-day regimens of cisplatin 70mg/m(2) with either docetaxel 60 mg/m(2) (n = 71) or pemetrexed 500 mg/m(2) (n = 77) for <= 4 cycles. The primary objective was to assess the noninferiority of progression-free survival (PFS) for patients receiving the Doc-Cis regimen. The secondary endpoints were the response rates, overall survival, and toxicity profiles. Results: Partial remission was observed in 24 (31.2%) and 24 (33.8%) patients in the Pem-Cis and Doc-Cis groups, respectively. The median PFS was 4.7 months (95% confidence interval [CI], 4.4-5.0) in the Pem-Cis arm and 4.4 months (95% CI, 3.7-5.1) in the Doc-Cis arm (P > .05). The median overall survival was longer in the Doc-Cis arm (13.3 months; 95% CI, 8.1-18.5) than in the Pem-Cis arm (11.7 months; 95% CI, 8.6-14.8; P > .05). Between the 2 arms, no significant difference was found in the subsequent treatments after failure of first-line treatment. The rate of grade 3 or 4 neutropenia and febrile neutropenia was greater in the Doc-Cis arm than in the Pem-Cis arm. Conclusion: In nonsquamous non-small-cell lung cancer patients lacking driver mutations, the PFS and response rates were similar between the 2 arms, and toxicity was tolerable, although adverse events and more severe toxicities were observed more frequently in the Doc-Cis arm.
Files in This Item
There are no files associated with this item.
Appears in
Collections
College of Medicine > Department of Medical Science > 1. Journal Articles

qrcode

Items in ScholarWorks are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.

Altmetrics

Total Views & Downloads

BROWSE