Detailed Information

Cited 0 time in webofscience Cited 0 time in scopus
Metadata Downloads

A randomised, double-blind, phase 3 study comparing the efficacy and safety of ceftazidime/avibactam plus metronidazole versus meropenem for complicated intra-abdominal infections in hospitalised adults in Asia

Authors
Qin, XinyuBinh Giang TranKim, Min JaWang, LieDung Anh NguyenChen, QianSong, JieLaud, Peter J.Stone, Gregory G.Chow, Joseph W.
Issue Date
May-2017
Publisher
ELSEVIER SCIENCE BV
Keywords
Ceftazidime/avibactam; Complicated intra-abdominal infection; Phase 3; Efficacy; Safety; Asia
Citation
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF ANTIMICROBIAL AGENTS, v.49, no.5, pp.579 - 588
Indexed
SCIE
SCOPUS
Journal Title
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF ANTIMICROBIAL AGENTS
Volume
49
Number
5
Start Page
579
End Page
588
URI
https://scholar.korea.ac.kr/handle/2021.sw.korea/83530
DOI
10.1016/j.ijantimicag.2017.01.010
ISSN
0924-8579
Abstract
Ceftazidime/avibactam comprises the broad-spectrum cephalosporin ceftazidime and the non-beta-lactam beta-lactamase inhibitor avibactam. This phase 3, randomised, double-blind study (NCT01726023) assessed the efficacy and safety of ceftazidime/avibactam plus metronidazole compared with meropenem in patients with complicated intra-abdominal infection (cIAI) in Asian countries. Subjects aged 18-90 years and hospitalised with cIAI requiring surgical intervention were randomised 1: 1 to receive every 8 h either: ceftazidime/avibactam (2000/500 mg, 2-h infusion) followed by metronidazole (500 mg, 60-min infusion); or meropenem (1000 mg, 30-min infusion). Non-inferiority of ceftazidime/avibactam plus metronidazole to meropenem was concluded if the lower limit of the 95% confidence interval (CI) for the between-group difference in clinical cure rate was greater than -12.5% at the test-of-cure (TOC) visit (28-35 days after randomisation) in the clinically evaluable (CE) population. Safety was also evaluated. Of 441 subjects randomised, 432 received at least one dose of study medication (ceftazidime/avibactam plus metronidazole, n = 215; meropenem, n = 217). In the CE population at the TOC visit, non-inferiority of ceftazidime/avibactam plus metronidazole to meropenem was demonstrated, with clinical cure reported for 93.8% (166/177) and 94.0% (173/184) of subjects, respectively (between-group difference, -0.2, 95% CI -5.53 to 4.97). The clinical cure rate with ceftazidime/avibactam plus metronidazole was comparable in subjects with ceftazidime-non-susceptible and ceftazidime-susceptible isolates (95.7% vs. 92.1%, respectively). Adverse events were similar between the study groups. Ceftazidime/avibactam plus metronidazole was non-inferior to meropenem in the treatment of cIAIs in Asian populations and was effective against ceftazidime-non-susceptible pathogens. No new safety concerns were identified. (C) 2017 The Authors. Published by Elsevier B.V.
Files in This Item
There are no files associated with this item.
Appears in
Collections
College of Medicine > Department of Medical Science > 1. Journal Articles

qrcode

Items in ScholarWorks are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.

Altmetrics

Total Views & Downloads

BROWSE