서울시 고교생의 대학입학전형 영향요인 분석: 정시전형과 학생부종합전형 비교를 중심으로

Abstract

After introducing the College Admission Simplification Policy, there has been debate aboutwhether general admission or the Comprehensive School Report (CSR) admission is a better system. Specifically, some believe the CSR maintains its positive impact on enhancing public education withcurricular diversity and in selecting promising students. On the contrary, others doubt its fairnessand reliability and criticize this new policy for excessively burdening students and their parents withapplication preparations. This study examines the impacts of family background, educational settings,and extracurricular activities on choosing a specific admission type. Using Seoul EducationalLongitudinal Study (SELS) data, results showed that living in an educationally privileged area had asignificant effect on reducing the likelihood of choosing the CSR type but household income andparental education were not significant. Next, the analysis found significance in the associationbetween extracurricular activities and college admission type choice. More proactive participation incareer development activities and higher level of career maturity were related to higher likelihoodto get admitted by colleges through the CSR type. Lastly, parental support for students’ educationaland career development had mixed impacts on choosing admission types. Parents who spent more onprivate tutoring services were more likely to choose the CSR type. However, parental effort toparticipate in college fairs and paid consulting was not significantly related to admission type choice.