Detailed Information

Cited 0 time in webofscience Cited 0 time in scopus
Metadata Downloads

Measuring the Degree of Convergence between Informal and Formal Acceptability Judgments for KoreanMeasuring the Degree of Convergence between Informal and Formal Acceptability Judgments for Korean

Other Titles
Measuring the Degree of Convergence between Informal and Formal Acceptability Judgments for Korean
Authors
송상헌이상근최재웅오은정
Issue Date
2017
Publisher
한국언어학회
Keywords
Experimental syntax; Acceptability judgments; Korean; Likert scale tasks; κ-test; PsychoPy
Citation
언어, v.42, no.4, pp.761 - 804
Indexed
KCI
Journal Title
언어
Volume
42
Number
4
Start Page
761
End Page
804
URI
https://scholar.korea.ac.kr/handle/2021.sw.korea/85925
DOI
10.18855/lisoko.2017.42.4.007
ISSN
1229-4039
Abstract
Song, Sanghoun, Lee Sang-Geun , Choe Jae-Woong & Oh Eunjeong. 2017. Measuring the Degree of Convergence between Informal and Formal Acceptability Judgments for Korean. Korean Journal of Linguistics, 42-4, 761-804. The present study attempts to quantify the extent to which the acceptability judgments of naïve native speakers coincide with those of linguists in the domain of Korean syntax. We excerpted 1,554 pairs from articles published in a theoretical syntax journal on Korean, Studies in Generative Grammar, from 1991 to 2014, and then randomly chose 287 pairs. Employing PsychoPy as the toolkit and a five-point Likert scale as the task, we collected 68,388 data points from 328 naïve participants. Two statistical analyses, a one-tailed T-test and a κ-test, were then run on the Z-score transformed data points. The T-test, which determines the directionality of difference, yielded a convergence rate of 88.15% between the two types of judgments. The κ-test, which estimates both the size and directionality of difference, obtained a convergence rate of 82.93%. 16 pairs that passed the T-test in a measure of directionality failed to pass the κ-test when testing both directionality and size of difference by degree of match/mismatch between the two types of judgments. Such consideration leads us to believe that the κ-test is more appropriate for detecting the size of the difference between the two types of judgments, as well as the directionality of the difference. We also classified convergence results into 4 patterns: (i) convergence for both sentences in the pair, (ii) divergence for only the bad sentences in the pair, (iii) divergence for only the good sentences in the pair, and (iv) divergence for both sentences in the pair. These patterns play a role in interpreting different convergence rates obtained in the study. We discuss the implications of the κ-test convergence rate for our research question and the use of κ-tests and patterns in experimental syntax studies. (Incheon National University, Korea University, Sangmyung University)
Files in This Item
There are no files associated with this item.
Appears in
Collections
College of Education > Department of English Language Education > 1. Journal Articles

qrcode

Items in ScholarWorks are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.

Related Researcher

Researcher Lee, Sang Geun photo

Lee, Sang Geun
사범대학 (영어교육과)
Read more

Altmetrics

Total Views & Downloads

BROWSE