Detailed Information

Cited 0 time in webofscience Cited 0 time in scopus
Metadata Downloads

The impact of different L1 and L2 learning experience in the acquisition of L1 phonological processes

Authors
Cho, Mi-HuiLee, Shinsook
Issue Date
7월-2016
Publisher
ELSEVIER SCI LTD
Keywords
L1 and L2 learning experience; L1 phonological development; t-palatalization; h-merger; Sound variability; Bilingual benefits
Citation
LANGUAGE SCIENCES, v.56, pp.30 - 44
Indexed
SSCI
AHCI
SCOPUS
Journal Title
LANGUAGE SCIENCES
Volume
56
Start Page
30
End Page
44
URI
https://scholar.korea.ac.kr/handle/2021.sw.korea/88110
DOI
10.1016/j.langsci.2016.02.006
ISSN
0388-0001
Abstract
Previous studies on the effect of L2 experience on L1 acquisition mostly focused on the segmental level without taking into consideration phonological processes. In particular, whether learners' different L1 and L2 learning experience affects their acquisition of L1 phonological processes has not been much explored. This study investigated the impact of different L1 Korean-L2 English learning experience in the acquisition of L1 phonological processes (t-palatalization and h-merger) among three groups of Korean children (mean age: 9): 20 Korean monolingual, 21 Returnee and 19 ESL children. In production the children read orthographically presented stimuli embedded in sentences. In perception both standard (target-appropriate) and spelling-based non-standard variant (target inappropriate) pronunciations of target words were aurally presented in sentential contexts and the children judged the target appropriateness. The results of the production and perception tests indicated the effect of different L1 and L2 learning experience in the acquisition of L1 phonological processes due to the monolingual and Returnee children significantly outperforming the ESL children either in production or in perception. However, the Returnees outperformed the monolingual children on h-merger in perception, which may partly be accounted for by the Returnees' bilingual benefits and re-exposure to their L1. An asymmetry between t-palatalization and h-merger was also found as all the children performed significantly better on h-merger than on t-palatalization. The asymmetry between the two phonological processes was accounted for in terms of variation and the intrinsic nature of the phonological processes. (C) 2016 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
Files in This Item
There are no files associated with this item.
Appears in
Collections
College of Education > Department of English Language Education > 1. Journal Articles

qrcode

Items in ScholarWorks are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.

Altmetrics

Total Views & Downloads

BROWSE