Psychometric analysis of the Korean version of the high-dose chemotherapy specific quality of life questionnaire module from the European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer (EORTC QLQ-HDC29)
- Authors
- Kim, Kyung Im; Kim, Jae Hyun; Ji, Eun Hee; Jang, Jun Ho; Kim, Jin Seok; Kwon, Ji-Hyun; Kim, Inho; Park, Seonyang; Velikova, Galina; Yoon, Sung-Soo; Oh, Jung Mi
- Issue Date
- 4월-2016
- Publisher
- SPRINGER
- Keywords
- Hematopoietic stem cell transplantation; High-dose chemotherapy; QLQ-HDC29; Quality of life; Validation
- Citation
- QUALITY OF LIFE RESEARCH, v.25, no.4, pp.881 - 890
- Indexed
- SCIE
SSCI
SCOPUS
- Journal Title
- QUALITY OF LIFE RESEARCH
- Volume
- 25
- Number
- 4
- Start Page
- 881
- End Page
- 890
- URI
- https://scholar.korea.ac.kr/handle/2021.sw.korea/88982
- DOI
- 10.1007/s11136-015-1121-5
- ISSN
- 0962-9343
- Abstract
- We evaluated the psychometric properties of the Korean version of the European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer high-dose chemotherapy specific quality of life questionnaire module (EORTC QLQ-HDC29) when implemented with Korean patients by conducting a multicenter, longitudinal study in three Korean hospitals. A total of 226 patients who scheduled to receive the HDC followed by hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT) were enrolled. The patients were asked to complete three questionnaires [the EORTC Core Questionnaire (QLQ-C30), QLQ-HDC29, and the Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy-Bone Marrow Transplantation] at four points in time: before HSCT and 100, 180, and 365 days after HSCT. Standard validity and reliability analyses were performed. Internal consistency of the QLQ-HDC29 was generally acceptable, as tested by Cronbach's alpha, except for the scales body image and the inpatient issues. Cronbach's alpha values for the Korean version of the QLQ-HDC29 were almost in accordance with results of the original version, except for the scales body image (lower to the original QLQ-HDC29, alpha = 0.73) and impact on family (higher to the original QLQ-HDC29, alpha = 0.52). Known-group comparison analyses showed significantly higher symptom burdens in patients with poor performance status or graft versus host disease (similar to the original QLQ-HDC29). The QLQ-HDC29 indicated good convergent and discriminant validity and showed responsiveness to changes in line with a clinical course over time after HSCT. The QLQ-HDC29 is generally reliable and adequate to assess QoL in Korean patients undergoing HDC followed by HSCT.
- Files in This Item
- There are no files associated with this item.
- Appears in
Collections - College of Pharmacy > Department of Pharmaceutical Science > 1. Journal Articles
Items in ScholarWorks are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.