Detailed Information

Cited 0 time in webofscience Cited 0 time in scopus
Metadata Downloads

Tolerability and Outcomes of First-Line Pemetrexed-Cisplatin Followed by Gefitinib Maintenance Therapy Versus Gefitinib Monotherapy in Korean Patients with Advanced Nonsquamous Non-small Cell Lung Cancer: A Post Hoc Descriptive Subgroup Analysis of a Randomized, Phase 3 Trial

Authors
Kang, Jin HyoungAhn, Myung-JuKim, Dong-WanCho, Eun KyungKim, Joo-HangShin, Sang WonWang, XinKim, Jong SeokOrlando, MauroPark, Keunchil
Issue Date
Apr-2016
Publisher
KOREAN CANCER ASSOCIATION
Keywords
Carcinoma; Non-small-cell lung carcinoma; Epidermal growth factor receptor; Korea; Pemetrexed; Gefitinib
Citation
CANCER RESEARCH AND TREATMENT, v.48, no.2, pp.458 - 464
Indexed
SCIE
SCOPUS
KCI
Journal Title
CANCER RESEARCH AND TREATMENT
Volume
48
Number
2
Start Page
458
End Page
464
URI
https://scholar.korea.ac.kr/handle/2021.sw.korea/89117
DOI
10.4143/crt.2015.135
ISSN
1598-2998
Abstract
Purpose We recently reported on a randomized, open-label, phase 3 trial comparing pemetrexedcisplatin chemotherapy followed by gefitinib maintenance therapy (PC/G) with gefitinib monotherapy in patients with non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). Here, we report on a post hoc subgroup analysis of that study assessing the demographics and disposition of the Korean patient subgroup, and comparing the tolerability of PC/G and gefitinib monotherapy and the tumor response with respect to epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) status. Materials and Methods Patients, who were 18 years, chemonalve, Korean, light ex-smokers/never-smokers with advanced NSCLC, were randomly assigned (1:1) to PC/G or gefitinib monotherapy. Treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAEs) were graded, and tumor response was measured as change in lesion sum from baseline at best response. The study was registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT01017874. Results Overall, 111 Korean patients were treated (PC/G, 51; gefitinib, 60). Between-arm characteristics were balanced and similar to those of the overall population. Treatment discontinuations due to adverse events were low (PC/G: 1, 2.0%; gefitinib: 7, 11.7%). Overall, 92 patients (82.9%) reported >= 1 TEAE (PC/G, 44; gefitinib, 48); few patients (PC/G, 16; gefitinib, 7) reported severe TEAEs; the most frequent was neutropenia (PC/G arm) and elevated alanine aminotransferase (gefitinib arm). The lesion sum was decreased by PC/G treatment in most patients, regardless of EGFR mutation status, while gefitinib monotherapy reduced the lesion sum in EGFR-positive patients but had no effect in EGFR-negative patients. Conclusion Our results confirm that both PC/G and gefitinib were well tolerated in Korean patients, regardless of EGFR status; however, patients with EGFR wild-type NSCLC may not benefit from gefitinib monotherapy.
Files in This Item
There are no files associated with this item.
Appears in
Collections
College of Medicine > Department of Medical Science > 1. Journal Articles

qrcode

Items in ScholarWorks are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.

Related Researcher

Researcher Shin, Sang Won photo

Shin, Sang Won
College of Medicine (Department of Medical Science)
Read more

Altmetrics

Total Views & Downloads

BROWSE