Detailed Information

Cited 0 time in webofscience Cited 0 time in scopus
Metadata Downloads

Current State of Abdominal Computed Tomography Performed in Emergency Department of a Tertiary University Hospital and Development of a Preliminary Interpretation ChecklistCurrent State of Abdominal Computed Tomography Performed in Emergency Department of a Tertiary University Hospital and Development of a Preliminary Interpretation Checklist

Other Titles
Current State of Abdominal Computed Tomography Performed in Emergency Department of a Tertiary University Hospital and Development of a Preliminary Interpretation Checklist
Authors
서준영송주현문성우조한진박종학김주영전성호차재형
Issue Date
2016
Publisher
대한응급의학회
Keywords
Computed tomography; Emergency service; Hospital; Interpretation
Citation
대한응급의학회지, v.27, no.4, pp.336 - 344
Indexed
KCI
Journal Title
대한응급의학회지
Volume
27
Number
4
Start Page
336
End Page
344
URI
https://scholar.korea.ac.kr/handle/2021.sw.korea/90570
ISSN
1226-4334
Abstract
Purpose: Abdominal computed tomography (CT) is a widely recognized method to diagnose patients with acute abdominal pain in the emergency departments (EDs). We aimed to investigate the current state and interpretations of abdominal CT performed in the ED of a tertiary university hospital. Methods: This was a retrospective study based on an abdominal CT database and medical records of patients over 15 years of age, who had visited our ED between January 1 and December 31, 2013. The data collected included CT types, final interpretations, characteristics of the patients, and location of pain at the time of CT. Results: A total of 1,978 abdominal CTs were performed among 1,923 patients during the research period. The most frequent organs involved in the major diagnosis were those in the urinary system, followed by the appendix, liver, large intestine, and gallbladder. The most frequently interpreted diagnoses in these organs were in the order of urinary stone, appendicitis, liver cirrhosis, infectious colitis, and acute cholecystitis. The most frequent location of pain was the right lower quadrant (429 cases, 21.7%), and the most frequently performed CT types were contrast-enhanced abdominal and pelvic CT (1,260 cases, 63.7%). Conclusion: Various interpretations were derived based on the abdominal CTs, ranging from critical to mild diseases and from common to rare diseases. Based on this study, we have developed a preliminary interpretation checklist for abdominal CTs.
Files in This Item
There are no files associated with this item.
Appears in
Collections
College of Medicine > Department of Medical Science > 1. Journal Articles

qrcode

Items in ScholarWorks are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.

Altmetrics

Total Views & Downloads

BROWSE