Detailed Information

Cited 0 time in webofscience Cited 0 time in scopus
Metadata Downloads

Properties controlling the bend-assisted fracture of AHSS

Authors
Lee, J.Kim, J. H.Lee, M. G.Barlat, F.Zhou, C.Chen, Z.Wagoner, R. H.
Issue Date
Dec-2015
Publisher
PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
Keywords
Draw-bend fracture test; Constitutive behavior; Ductility; Elastic-plastic material; Finite elements
Citation
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF PLASTICITY, v.75, pp.100 - 120
Indexed
SCIE
SCOPUS
Journal Title
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF PLASTICITY
Volume
75
Start Page
100
End Page
120
URI
https://scholar.korea.ac.kr/handle/2021.sw.korea/91839
DOI
10.1016/j.ijplas.2015.03.009
ISSN
0749-6419
Abstract
Bend-assisted fracture, also commonly called shear fracture, is the splitting of metal sheets during forming in tight-bending regions. It has been shown to be predominantly a result of plastic localization for most advanced high strength steels (AHSS). Such fractures are poorly predicted by typical industrial methods involving finite element modeling (FEM) and forming limit diagrams (FLDs). In order to understand the source of the problem, the sensitivity of simulated shear-fracture formability to material and process parameters was determined using FEM in conjunction with a realistic range of constitutive models, element sizes, and friction coefficients. Two types of shear fracture process were simulated. (1) Draw-bend fracture (DBF) tests are laboratory analogs of industrial forming conditions producing shear fracture; they offer the opportunity of experimental validation but introduce complexity because of varying strain state and unavoidable transitions between shear fracture and tensile fracture. (2) Plane-strain (PS) draw-bend fracture simulations correspond more closely to industrial forming conditions; they simplify the modeling (fixed strain state, no transitions) but no corresponding full-scale laboratory experiments currently exist. The DBF test was found to be sensitive to every material and process parameter tested, with the largest factors being the form of 1-D hardening law and the yield function. Varying these quantities in ranges representing what practical measurements would produce showed variations in predicted formability of up to 80%. The PS simulations, which represent industrial practice more closely, showed large variations in predicted formability only for two variables: 1-D hardening law and friction coefficient. All other parameters were insignificant, except for thermo-mechanical effects, which were important for high-rate tests only. These results show why it is difficult or impossible to predict shear fracture using standard industrial techniques designed for traditional steels. They suggest ways to modify such techniques to accommodate advanced high strength steels. The results also give guidance to alloy designers in terms of which constitutive parameters are most important in inhibiting shear fracture, and which are relatively insignificant. (C) 2015 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
Files in This Item
There are no files associated with this item.
Appears in
Collections
College of Engineering > Department of Materials Science and Engineering > 1. Journal Articles

qrcode

Items in ScholarWorks are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.

Altmetrics

Total Views & Downloads

BROWSE