Detailed Information

Cited 0 time in webofscience Cited 0 time in scopus
Metadata Downloads

Towards a universal barcode of oomycetes - a comparison of the cox1 and cox2 loci

Authors
Choi, Young-JoonBeakes, GordonGlockling, SallyKruse, JuliaNam, BoraNigrelli, LisaPloch, SebastianShin, Hyeon-DongShivas, Roger G.Telle, SabineVoglmayr, HermannThines, Marco
Issue Date
Nov-2015
Publisher
WILEY
Keywords
barcoding; cytochrome oxidase; herbarium specimen; mtDNA; oomycete-specific primers
Citation
MOLECULAR ECOLOGY RESOURCES, v.15, no.6, pp.1275 - 1288
Indexed
SCIE
SCOPUS
Journal Title
MOLECULAR ECOLOGY RESOURCES
Volume
15
Number
6
Start Page
1275
End Page
1288
URI
https://scholar.korea.ac.kr/handle/2021.sw.korea/91978
DOI
10.1111/1755-0998.12398
ISSN
1755-098X
Abstract
Oomycetes are a diverse group of eukaryotes in terrestrial, limnic and marine habitats worldwide and include several devastating plant pathogens, for example Phytophthora infestans (potato late blight). The cytochrome c oxidase subunit 2 gene (cox2) has been widely used for identification, taxonomy and phylogeny of various oomycete groups. However, recently the cox1 gene was proposed as a DNA barcode marker instead, together with ITS rDNA. The cox1 locus has been used in some studies of Pythium and Phytophthora, but has rarely been used for other oomycetes, as amplification success of cox1 varies with different lineages and sample ages. To determine which out of cox1 or cox2 is best suited as a universal oomycete barcode, we compared these two genes in terms of (i) PCR efficiency for 31 representative genera, as well as for historic herbarium specimens, and (ii) sequence polymorphism, intra- and interspecific divergence. The primer sets for cox2 successfully amplified all oomycete genera tested, while cox1 failed to amplify three genera. In addition, cox2 exhibited higher PCR efficiency for historic herbarium specimens, providing easier access to barcoding-type material. Sequence data for several historic type specimens exist for cox2, but there are none for cox1. In addition, cox2 yielded higher species identification success, with higher interspecific and lower intraspecific divergences than cox1. Therefore, cox2 is suggested as a partner DNA barcode along with ITS rDNA instead of cox1. The cox2-1 spacer could be a useful marker below species level. Improved protocols and universal primers are presented for all genes to facilitate future barcoding efforts.
Files in This Item
There are no files associated with this item.
Appears in
Collections
College of Life Sciences and Biotechnology > Division of Environmental Science and Ecological Engineering > 1. Journal Articles

qrcode

Items in ScholarWorks are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.

Altmetrics

Total Views & Downloads

BROWSE