Detailed Information

Cited 0 time in webofscience Cited 0 time in scopus
Metadata Downloads

Rehabilitation with osteopathic manipulative treatment after lumbar disc surgery: A randomised, controlled pilot study

Authors
Kim, ByunghHo J.Ahn, JungHoonCho, HeeCheolKim, DongYunKim, TaeYeongYoon, BumChul
Issue Date
9월-2015
Publisher
ELSEVIER SCI LTD
Keywords
Exercise; Lumbar open laser microdiscectomy; Osteopathic manipulative treatment; Post-operative disability; Residual pain; Rehabilitation
Citation
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF OSTEOPATHIC MEDICINE, v.18, no.3, pp.181 - 188
Indexed
SCIE
SCOPUS
Journal Title
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF OSTEOPATHIC MEDICINE
Volume
18
Number
3
Start Page
181
End Page
188
URI
https://scholar.korea.ac.kr/handle/2021.sw.korea/92698
DOI
10.1016/j.ijosm.2014.11.003
ISSN
1746-0689
Abstract
Background: Despite growing evidence regarding the role of osteopathic manipulative treatment (OMT) for the management of low back pain, there is little evidence to support the use of OMT as a post-operative rehabilitation to improve the functional outcomes of lumbar disc surgery. Objective: To assess the feasibility for a future definitive randomised control trial that would indicate whether OMT improves post-operative outcomes after lumbar microdiscectomy compared to a standard exercise programme. Design: Randomised controlled pilot study. Setting: Department of Spinal Surgery and Department of Spinal Rehabilitation at a major metropolitan spine surgery hospital, Seoul, South Korea. Methods: Patients who underwent lumbar nnicrodiscectomy due to low back pain with referred leg pain resulting from a herniated disc were enrolled in the study. Thirty-three patients aged 25-65 years were randomly assigned using a random number table to the OMT (n = 16) group or exercise group (n = 17). Patients received the allocated intervention twice a week for 4 weeks. Each session was 30 min. Primary outcomes were post-surgical functional disability and intensity of low back and leg pain. Outcome measures were assessed at baseline (2-3 weeks after surgery) and post-intervention (7-8 weeks after surgery). Double blinding was not feasible in the study setting. Results: Thirty-three participants were analysed. Both rehabilitation interventions improved all primary and secondary outcomes. Post-surgical physical disability improved more with OMT rehabilitation than the exercise programme (54% vs. 26%, P < 0.05). Residual leg pain decreased with OMT (53%) and exercise (17%). Post-operative low back pain decreased by 37% in the OMT group and 10% in the exercise group. Patients in both groups required less frequent use of medication and were highly satisfied with the rehabilitation interventions. No side effects or complications from any intervention were reported. Conclusion: The current pilot study shows the feasibility of a future definitive randomised control trial investigating whether rehabilitation with OMT is a viable approach for post-operative management of a lumbar microdiscectomy. (C) 2014 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
Files in This Item
There are no files associated with this item.
Appears in
Collections
College of Health Sciences > School of Health and Environmental Science > 1. Journal Articles

qrcode

Items in ScholarWorks are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.

Altmetrics

Total Views & Downloads

BROWSE