Detailed Information

Cited 0 time in webofscience Cited 0 time in scopus
Metadata Downloads

Standardization of Laparoscopic Total Mesorectal Excision for Rectal Cancer A Structured International Expert Consensus

Authors
Miskovic, DaniloFoster, JakeAgha, AymanDelaney, Conor P.Francis, NaderHasegawa, HirotoshiKarachun, AlexeyKim, Seon HahnLaw, Wai LunMarks, JohnMorino, MarioPanis, YvesPatron Uriburu, Juan CarlosWexner, Steven D.Parvaiz, Amjad
Issue Date
Apr-2015
Publisher
LIPPINCOTT WILLIAMS & WILKINS
Keywords
colorectal surgery; consensus; expert; laparoscopic; rectal cancer; total mesorectal excision
Citation
ANNALS OF SURGERY, v.261, no.4, pp.716 - 722
Indexed
SCIE
SCOPUS
Journal Title
ANNALS OF SURGERY
Volume
261
Number
4
Start Page
716
End Page
722
URI
https://scholar.korea.ac.kr/handle/2021.sw.korea/93947
DOI
10.1097/SLA.0000000000000823
ISSN
0003-4932
Abstract
Objective: To establish a structured international expert consensus on a detailed technical description of the laparoscopic total mesorectal excision (TME). Background: Laparoscopic TME is a common surgical approach for the treatment of rectal cancer, but there is little agreement on technical details and standards. Methods: Sixty leading surgical experts from 5 different world regions with a median overall experience of 250 laparoscopic TME participated in this study. Four stages of mixed quantitative and qualitative consensus-finding methods were applied. (1) Semistructured expert interviews were independently analyzed by 2 assessors. (2) Consensus on the interview data was reached using reiterating questionnaires (Delphi method). (3) This was further refined in an interactive workshop. (4) Based on this meeting, a comprehensive text was drafted and final approval was sought by all experts. Findings: Three theme categories were identified in 9 detailed interviews (anatomical landmarks, description of tissue retraction, and operating strategies). Following 2 rounds of a 54-item questionnaire, 29 items achieved very high agreement (A* >= 90%), 14 with good agreement (>= 80%), 13 with moderate agreement (>= 50%), and 18 with little or no agreement (<50%). In the workshop, areas of agreement were consolidated and conclusions were sought for those with less agreement. The final document was approved after 2 further rounds of surveys by all respondents. Conclusions: This detailed and agreed technical description of laparoscopic TME may have implications on training, assessment, quality control, and future research.
Files in This Item
There are no files associated with this item.
Appears in
Collections
College of Medicine > Department of Medical Science > 1. Journal Articles

qrcode

Items in ScholarWorks are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.

Altmetrics

Total Views & Downloads

BROWSE