Detailed Information

Cited 0 time in webofscience Cited 0 time in scopus
Metadata Downloads

The laboratory performance of the enFLOW (R), buddy lite (TM) and ThermoSens (R) fluid warmers

Authors
Kim, H. J.Yoo, S. M.Jung, J. S.Lee, S. H.Sun, K.Son, H. S.
Issue Date
2월-2015
Publisher
WILEY-BLACKWELL
Citation
ANAESTHESIA, v.70, no.2, pp.205 - 208
Indexed
SCIE
SCOPUS
Journal Title
ANAESTHESIA
Volume
70
Number
2
Start Page
205
End Page
208
URI
https://scholar.korea.ac.kr/handle/2021.sw.korea/94539
DOI
10.1111/anae.12906
ISSN
0003-2409
Abstract
We measured heating of isotonic saline by three fluid warmers in six experiments: saline at 5 degrees C or 20 degrees C delivered at 30, 50 or 100ml.min(-1). At the three flow rates, the enFLOW((R)), buddy lite and ThermoSens((R)) systems heated 5 degrees C saline to mean (SD) temperatures of: 41.1 (0.5) degrees C, 37.7 (0.6) degrees C and 39.1 (0.6)degrees C; to 40.3 (0.8) degrees C, 33.9 (1.6) degrees C and 39.3 (0.7)degrees C; and to 37.1 (0.8) degrees C, 24.0 (1.3) degrees C and 37.6 (1.0)degrees C, respectively, p<0.0001 for each experiment. The mean (SD) times taken to heat 5 degrees C saline were: 16.6 (1.7) s, 258.4 (58.9) s and 134.2 (79.6)s; 16.9 (1.8) s, 256.2 (62.2) s and 182.5 (74.5)s; and 21.5 (1.5) s, 275.9 (49.3) s and 313.5 (18.0)s, respectively, p<0.0003 for each experiment. The results for saline at 20 degrees C were similar. The enFLOW system heated saline above 36 degrees C faster than the ThermoSens system, whereas the buddy lite often failed to achieve 36 degrees C.
Files in This Item
There are no files associated with this item.
Appears in
Collections
College of Medicine > Department of Medical Science > 1. Journal Articles

qrcode

Items in ScholarWorks are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.

Altmetrics

Total Views & Downloads

BROWSE