Detailed Information

Cited 0 time in webofscience Cited 0 time in scopus
Metadata Downloads

Efficacy and Safety of 30-Mg Fimasartan for the Treatment of Patients With Mild to Moderate Hypertension: An 8-Week, Multicenter, Randomized, Double-Blind, Phase III Clinical Study

Authors
Youn, Jong-ChanIhm, Sang-HyunBae, Jang-HoPark, Seong-MiJeon, Dong WoonJung, Byung-ChunPark, Tae HoLee, Nae HeeSong, Jong-MinYoon, Young WonShin, Eun SeokSung, Ki ChulJung, In HyunPyun, Wool BumJoo, Seung-JaePark, Woo JungShin, Jin HoKang, Seok-Min
Issue Date
Oct-2014
Publisher
ELSEVIER
Keywords
fimasartan; hypertension; placebo; valsartan
Citation
CLINICAL THERAPEUTICS, v.36, no.10, pp.1412 - 1421
Indexed
SCIE
SCOPUS
Journal Title
CLINICAL THERAPEUTICS
Volume
36
Number
10
Start Page
1412
End Page
1421
URI
https://scholar.korea.ac.kr/handle/2021.sw.korea/97353
DOI
10.1016/j.clinthera.2014.07.004
ISSN
0149-2918
Abstract
Purpose: The standard 60-mg dose of fimasartan, a newly developed selective angiotensin II receptor blocker, is effective and safe for use in patients with mild to moderate hypertension. This study aimed to compare the efficacy and safety of low-dose (30 mg) fimasartan and placebo or valsartan (80 mg) for 8 weeks in patients with mild to moderate hypertension. Methods: In this randomized trial, 293 patients (219 men; mean age, 54.24 [9.77] years) with mild to moderate hypertension were enrolled. After randomization to receive 30-mg fimasartan (n = 115), placebo (n = 117), or 80-mg valsartan (n = 61), the treatment dose was kept constant without dose escalation for 8 weeks. The primary end point was improvement in sitting diastolic blood pressure (SiDBP) from baseline to 8 weeks that was compared between treatments with low-dose fimasartan and placebo. The secondary end point was the overall efficacy and safety of low-dose fimasartan compared with that of placebo or valsartan. Findings: At week 8, SiDBP changed by -9.93 (8.86) mm Hg in the fimasartan group and by -2.08 (9.47) mm Hg in the placebo group, which indicated significant antihypertensive efficacy (P < 0.0001). Efficacy was shown at week 4 as measured by SiDBP (-9.96 [7.73] vs -2.27 [7.85] mm Hg; P < 0.0001) or sitting systolic blood pressure (SiSBP) (-16.18 [14.44] vs -1.95 [13.48] mmHg; P < 0.0001) and at week 8 as determined by SiSBP (-15.35 [16.63] vs -2.30 [14.91] mm Hg; P < 0.0001). The fimasartan group exhibited more potent antihypertensive efficacy than the valsartan group both at week 4 (SiDBP, -9.96 [7.73] vs -6.53 [9.58] mm Hg [P = 0.0123]; SiSBP, -16.18 [14.4] vs -7.65 [12.89] mm Hg [P = 0.0002]) and at week 8 (SiDBP, -9.93 [8.86] vs -5.47 [8.96] mm Hg [P = 0.0021]; SiSBP, -15.35 [16.63] vs -7.49 [13.68] mm Hg [P = 0.0021]). Most treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAEs) were mild (89 of 95), and there were no serious TEAEs. The incidence of TEAEs was 19.1% in the fimasartan group, 22.6% in the placebo group, and 13.6% in the valsartan group, with no significant differences. (C) 2014 Elsevier HS Journals, Inc. All rights reserved.
Files in This Item
There are no files associated with this item.
Appears in
Collections
College of Medicine > Department of Medical Science > 1. Journal Articles

qrcode

Items in ScholarWorks are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.

Related Researcher

Researcher Park, Seong Mi photo

Park, Seong Mi
College of Medicine (Department of Medical Science)
Read more

Altmetrics

Total Views & Downloads

BROWSE