Detailed Information

Cited 0 time in webofscience Cited 0 time in scopus
Metadata Downloads

Painful cutaneous laser stimuli induce event-related oscillatory EEG activities that are different from those induced by nonpainful electrical stimuli

Authors
Chien, J. H.Liu, C. C.Kim, J. H.Markman, T. M.Lenz, F. A.
Issue Date
15-Aug-2014
Publisher
AMER PHYSIOLOGICAL SOC
Keywords
attention; cortex; event-related synchronization; EEG; human; pain
Citation
JOURNAL OF NEUROPHYSIOLOGY, v.112, no.4, pp.824 - 833
Indexed
SCIE
SCOPUS
Journal Title
JOURNAL OF NEUROPHYSIOLOGY
Volume
112
Number
4
Start Page
824
End Page
833
URI
https://scholar.korea.ac.kr/handle/2021.sw.korea/97681
DOI
10.1152/jn.00209.2014
ISSN
0022-3077
Abstract
The non-phase-locked EEG response to painful stimuli has usually been characterized as decreased oscillatory activity (event-related desynchronization, ERD) in the alpha band. Increased activity (event-related synchronization, ERS) in the gamma band has been reported more recently. We have now tested the hypothesis that the non-phase-locked responses to nonpainful electric cutaneous stimuli are different from those to painful cutaneous laser stimuli when the baseline salience of the two stimuli is the same and the salience during the protocol is modulated by count laser and count electric tasks. Both of these stimuli were presented in random order in a single train at intensities that produced the same baseline salience in the same somatic location. The response to the laser stimulus was characterized by five windows (designated windows I-V) in the time-frequency domain: early (200-400 ms) and late (600-1,400 ms) delta/theta ERS, 500-900 ms alpha ERD, 1,200-1,600 ms beta ERS (rebound), and 800-1,200 ms gamma ERS. Similar ERS/ERD windows of activity were found for the electric stimulus. Individual participants very commonly had activity in windows consistent with the overall analysis. Linear regression of ERS/ERD for parietal channels was most commonly found for sensory (pain or unpleasantness)- or attention (salience)-related measures. Overall, the main effect for modality was found in window I-delta/theta and window V-gamma, and the Modality with Task interaction was found in all five windows. All significant interaction terms included Modality as a factor. Therefore, Modality was the most common factor explaining our results, which is consistent with our hypothesis.
Files in This Item
There are no files associated with this item.
Appears in
Collections
College of Medicine > Department of Medical Science > 1. Journal Articles

qrcode

Items in ScholarWorks are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.

Related Researcher

Researcher Kim, Jong Hyun photo

Kim, Jong Hyun
College of Medicine (Department of Medical Science)
Read more

Altmetrics

Total Views & Downloads

BROWSE