Detailed Information

Cited 0 time in webofscience Cited 0 time in scopus
Metadata Downloads

Differential Prognostic Impact of Treatment Strategy Among Patients With Left Main Versus Non-Left Main Bifurcation Lesions Undergoing Percutaneous Coronary Intervention Results From the COBIS (Coronary Bifurcation Stenting) Registry II

Authors
Song, Young BinHahn, Joo-YongYang, Jeong HoonChoi, Seung-HyukChoi, Jin-HoLee, Sang HoonJeong, Myung-HoKim, Hyo-SooLee, Jae-HwanYu, Cheol WoongRha, Seung WoonJang, YangsooYoon, Jung HanTahk, Seung-JeaSeung, Ki BaeOh, Ju HyeonPark, Jong-SeonGwon, Hyeon-Cheol
Issue Date
Mar-2014
Publisher
ELSEVIER SCIENCE INC
Keywords
angioplasty; bifurcation lesions; drug-eluting stent(s); left main
Citation
JACC-CARDIOVASCULAR INTERVENTIONS, v.7, no.3, pp.255 - 263
Indexed
SCIE
SCOPUS
Journal Title
JACC-CARDIOVASCULAR INTERVENTIONS
Volume
7
Number
3
Start Page
255
End Page
263
URI
https://scholar.korea.ac.kr/handle/2021.sw.korea/99068
DOI
10.1016/j.jcin.2013.11.009
ISSN
1936-8798
Abstract
Objectives The authors sought to investigate whether the impact of treatment strategies on clinical outcomes differed between patients with left main (LM) bifurcation lesions and those with non-LM bifurcation lesions. Background Few studies have considered anatomic location when comparing 1- and 2-stent strategies for bifurcation lesions. Methods We compared the prognostic impact of treatment strategies on clinical outcomes in 2,044 patients with non-LM bifurcation lesions and 853 with LM bifurcation lesions. The primary outcome was target lesion failure (TLF) defined as a composite of cardiac death, myocardial infarction (MI), and target lesion revascularization. Results The 2-stent strategy was used more frequently in the LM bifurcation group than in the non-LM bifurcation group (40.3% vs. 20.8%, p < 0.01). During a median follow-up of 36 months, the 2-stent strategy was not associated with a higher incidence of cardiac death (hazard ratio [HR]: 1.24; 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.72 to 2.14; p = 0.44), cardiac death or MI (HR: 1.12; 95% CI: 0.58 to 2.19; p = 0.73), or TLF (HR: 1.39; 95% CI: 0.99 to 1.94; p = 0.06) in the non-LM bifurcation group. In contrast, in patients with LM bifurcation lesions, the 2-stent strategy was associated with a higher incidence of cardiac death (HR: 2.43; 95% CI: 1.05 to 5.59; p = 0.04), cardiac death or MI (HR: 2.09; 95% CI: 1.08 to 4.04; p = 0.03), as well as TLF (HR: 2.38; 95% CI: 1.60 to 3.55; p < 0.01). Significant interactions were present between treatment strategies and bifurcation lesion locations for TLF (p = 0.01). Conclusions The 1-stent strategy, if possible, should initially be considered the preferred approach for the treatment of coronary bifurcation lesions, especially LM bifurcation lesions. (Korean Coronary Bifurcation Stenting [COBIS] Registry II; NCT01642992) (C) 2014 by the American College of Cardiology Foundation
Files in This Item
There are no files associated with this item.
Appears in
Collections
College of Medicine > Department of Medical Science > 1. Journal Articles
Graduate School > Department of Biomedical Sciences > 1. Journal Articles

qrcode

Items in ScholarWorks are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.

Related Researcher

Researcher Rha, Seung Woon photo

Rha, Seung Woon
Department of Biomedical Sciences
Read more

Altmetrics

Total Views & Downloads

BROWSE