Detailed Information
Cited 0 time in 
Cited 0 time in 
Cited 0 time in
Metadata Downloads
Work-Family Conflict and Organisationally Valued Outcomes: The Moderating Role of Decision Latitude in Five National Contexts
- Authors
- Billing, Tejinder K.; Bhagat, Rabi S.; Babakus, Emin; Krishnan, Balaji; Ford, David L., Jr.; Srivastava, B. N.; Rajadhyaksha, Ujvala; Shin, Mannsoo; Kuo, Ben; Kwantes, Catherine; Setiadi, Bernadette; Nasurdin, Aizzat Mohd
- Issue Date
- 1월-2014
- Publisher
- WILEY
- Citation
- APPLIED PSYCHOLOGY-AN INTERNATIONAL REVIEW-PSYCHOLOGIE APPLIQUEE-REVUE INTERNATIONALE, v.63, no.1, pp.62 - 95
- Indexed
- SSCI
SCOPUS
- Volume
- 63
- Number
- 1
- Start Page
- 62
- End Page
- 95
- ISSN
- 0269-994X
- Abstract
- The moderating role of decision latitude on the relationship between work-family conflict and psychological strain was examined across five countries. It was hypothesised that decision latitude would moderate the relationship more strongly in the individualistic countries (the United States and Canada) than in the collectivistic countries (India, Indonesia, and South Korea). The results supported the hypotheses of this five-country-based cross-national investigation. The implications of the findings for theory and practice in the area of international and cross-cultural research on work and family conflicts in the organisational context are discussed.
- Files in This Item
- There are no files associated with this item.
Items in ScholarWorks are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.