Detailed Information

Cited 0 time in webofscience Cited 0 time in scopus
Metadata Downloads

Comparison of outpatient versus inpatient transurethral prostate resection for benign prostatic hyperplasia: Comparative, prospective bi-centre study

Authors
Kim, Jae HeonPark, Jae YoungShim, Ji SungLee, Jeong GuMoon, Du GeonYoo, Jeong WooChoi, HoonBae, Jae Hyun
Issue Date
1월-2014
Publisher
CANADIAN UROLOGICAL ASSOCIATION
Keywords
Benign Prostatic Hyperplasia (BPH); Transurethral Resection in Saline (TURIS-V); Transurethral Resection of the Prostate (TURP)
Citation
CUAJ-CANADIAN UROLOGICAL ASSOCIATION JOURNAL, v.8, no.1-2, pp.E30 - E35
Indexed
SCIE
SCOPUS
Journal Title
CUAJ-CANADIAN UROLOGICAL ASSOCIATION JOURNAL
Volume
8
Number
1-2
Start Page
E30
End Page
E35
URI
https://scholar.korea.ac.kr/handle/2021.sw.korea/99637
DOI
10.5489/cuaj.1370
ISSN
1911-6470
Abstract
Introduction: We compare the symptomatic relief with urodynamic parameter change and operative safety of the outpatient transurethral resection in saline (TURIS-V) technique with inpatient transurethral resection of the prostate (TURP) for the management of benign prostatic hyperplasia (BPH). Methods: This prospective cohort comparison study enrolled patients who needed BPH surgery. Between January 2010 and June 2011, outpatient TURIS-V was performed at 1 centre and the results of the treatment were compared with inpatient TURP performed at a separate hospital. Preoperative characteristics, including prostate volume, were similar in both groups. Perioperative data and any treatment complications were recorded. The analysis compared postoperative outcomes, including a 6-month postoperative International Prostate Symptom Score (IPSS), a quality of life (QoL) evaluation and a record of any changes in uroflowmetry findings, between the 2 groups. Results: In the TURIS-V patient group, 75 patients agreed to be in the study. Of these, 69 ultimately complete the study. In the TURP group, 76 patients agreed and 71 of these completed the study. Both study groups were well-matched for age, IPSS, QoL and uroflowmetry findings. The TURIS-V group experienced both shorter operation times (54.6 vs. 74.8 minutes) and shorter catheterization times (2.2 vs. 4.2 days) when compared to the TURP group. There were comparable improvements in the 6-month postoperative IPSS, QoL, and uroflowmetry findings between the 2 groups. There were also equally low incidence rates of procedural complications. onclusions: Both TURIS-V and TURP relieve lower urinary tract symptoms in a similar way, with great efficacy and safety. Overall, TURIS-V had shorter operative and catheterization times compared to TURP. Notwithstanding the paper's limitations (non-randomized cohort comparison with possible selection or surgeon bias and small heterogeneous sample size), TURIS-V can be performed safely even in an outpatient setting.
Files in This Item
There are no files associated with this item.
Appears in
Collections
College of Medicine > Department of Medical Science > 1. Journal Articles

qrcode

Items in ScholarWorks are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.

Related Researcher

Researcher Bae, Jae Hyun photo

Bae, Jae Hyun
의과대학 (의학과)
Read more

Altmetrics

Total Views & Downloads

BROWSE