Detailed Information

Cited 0 time in webofscience Cited 0 time in scopus
Metadata Downloads

Gamma Knife surgery for subependymal giant cell astrocytomas Clinical article

Authors
Park, Kyung-JaeKano, HideyukiKondziolka, DouglasNiranjan, AjayFlickinger, John C.Lunsford, L. Dade
Issue Date
Mar-2011
Publisher
AMER ASSOC NEUROLOGICAL SURGEONS
Keywords
Gamma Knife surgery; glioma; radiosurgery; subependymal giant cell astrocytoma
Citation
JOURNAL OF NEUROSURGERY, v.114, no.3, pp.808 - 813
Indexed
SCIE
SCOPUS
Journal Title
JOURNAL OF NEUROSURGERY
Volume
114
Number
3
Start Page
808
End Page
813
URI
https://scholar.korea.ac.kr/handle/2021.sw.korea/112920
DOI
10.3171/2010.9.JNS10816
ISSN
0022-3085
Abstract
Object. The authors report their experience of using Gamma Knife surgery (GKS) in patients with subependymal giant cell astrocytoma (SEGA). Methods. Over a 20-year period, the authors identified 6 patients with SEGAs who were eligible for GKS. The median patient age was 16.5 years (range 7-55 years). In 4 patients, GKS was used as a primary management therapy. One patient underwent radiosurgery for recurrent tumors after prior resection, and in 1 patient GKS was used as an adjunct after subtotal resection. The median tumor volume at GKS was 2.75 cm(3) (range 0.7-5.9 cm(3)). A median radiation dose of 14 Gy (range 11-20 Gy) was delivered to the tumor margin. Results. The median follow-up duration was 73 months (range 42-90 months). Overall local tumor control was achieved in 4 tumors (67%) with progression-free periods of 24, 42. 57, and 66 months. Three tumors regressed and one remained unchanged. In 2 patients the tumors progressed, and in 1 of these patients the lesion was managed by repeated GKS with subsequent tumor regression. The other relatively large tumor (5.9 cm(3)) was excised 9 months after GKS. The progression-free period for all GKS-managed tumors varied from 9 to 66 months. There were no cases of hydrocephalus or GKS-related morbidity. Conclusions. Gamma Knife surgery may be an additional minimally invasive management option for SEGA in a patient who harbors a small but progressively enlarging tumor when complete resection is not safely achievable. It may also benefit patients with a residual or recurrent tumor that has progressed after surgery. (DOI: 10.3171/2010.9.JNS10816)
Files in This Item
There are no files associated with this item.
Appears in
Collections
College of Medicine > Department of Medical Science > 1. Journal Articles

qrcode

Items in ScholarWorks are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.

Altmetrics

Total Views & Downloads

BROWSE