Detailed Information

Cited 0 time in webofscience Cited 0 time in scopus
Metadata Downloads

회생절차에 있어서 강제인가의 요건과 그 방법

Authors
김경욱
Issue Date
2011
Publisher
한국민사소송법학회
Keywords
강제인가; 회생절차; 회생계획; 공정과 형평; 절대우선설; 상대우선설; 계획의 수행가능성; 부당한 차별; 회생계획의 인가; 청산가치보장의 원칙; Cramdown; Reorganization Procedure; Reorganization Plan; Fair and Equitable; Absolute Priority Theory; Relative Priority Theory; Feasibility of Plan; Unfair Discrimination; Confirmation of Plan; Best Interest of Creditors Principle
Citation
민사소송, v.15, no.2, pp.453 - 493
Indexed
KCI
Journal Title
민사소송
Volume
15
Number
2
Start Page
453
End Page
493
URI
https://scholar.korea.ac.kr/handle/2021.sw.korea/114333
ISSN
1226-7686
Abstract
In the reorganization procedure, various classes of stakeholders participate. The law helps them make a group decision by classifying them into secured creditors, unsecured creditors, shareholders and interest holders and requiring a vote by each class on the reorganization plan (Article 236). The adoption of the reorganization plan requires the affirmative vote by all classes. However,even if the affirmative vote in one or more classes is less than the legal threshold for approval, the court is allowed to approve the reorganization plan (Article 244). This measure is called cramdown. It is intended to promote the efficient reorganization of a debtor and the protection of the rights of the stakeholders in a non-approving class on the basis that it is not socio-economically desirable to prevent a reorganization procedure for a debtor that deserves the reorganization only because of unreasonable demands by certain stakeholders. In this paper, the focus is on the detailed review of the contents and the meanings of the laws relating to the legal requirements and specific processes for the cramdown. In Chapter 2, the specific legal requirements for the courts to set forth the protection conditions and cram down the plan are reviewed in detail. Also included in this review is the general requirements for the approval of the reorganization plan as a part of such specific legal requirements. In Chapter 3, the procedures to set forth the protection conditions are divided into making the protection conditions before and after the plan is disapproved and the legal implications in each case are analyzed. Through this analysis, it is attempted to set forth the reasonable basis for understanding fairness and equity, relative priority rule and absolute priority rule, best interest of creditors principle, etc.
Files in This Item
There are no files associated with this item.
Appears in
Collections
Graduate School > School of Law > 1. Journal Articles

qrcode

Items in ScholarWorks are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.

Related Researcher

Researcher KIM, KYENG WOOK photo

KIM, KYENG WOOK
법학전문대학원
Read more

Altmetrics

Total Views & Downloads

BROWSE