위법한 근로자파견의 법률효과에 관한 법적 쟁점과 평가 - 대법원 2008. 09. 18. 선고 2007두22320 판결을 중심으로 -Legal Issues of Employment Agency Work Against the Employment Agency Worker Protection Act
- Other Titles
- Legal Issues of Employment Agency Work Against the Employment Agency Worker Protection Act
- Authors
- 박종희
- Issue Date
- 2009
- Publisher
- 고려대학교 법학연구원
- Keywords
- 근로자파견; 불법파견; 파견근로자보호 등에 관한 법률; 직업안정법; 연쇄적 근로관계; employment agency work; unlawful agency work; the Employment Agency Worker Protection Act; Job Security Act; consecutive employment relations
- Citation
- 고려법학, no.53, pp.277 - 299
- Indexed
- KCI
OTHER
- Journal Title
- 고려법학
- Number
- 53
- Start Page
- 277
- End Page
- 299
- URI
- https://scholar.korea.ac.kr/handle/2021.sw.korea/134768
- ISSN
- 1598-1584
- Abstract
- There are some legal issues in this decision of supreme court as follow. First, whether the section 6(3)(before repealed) of the Employment Agency Worker Protection Act must be applied to a employment agency work, even if the work is violating the Act. Second, whether, in case of such unlawful agency work, the agency employee can be regarded as a regular employee of the client (namely, the user employer) just at the end of two years like a lawful agency work under the Act. Otherwise, whether the unlawful work should be regarded as a regular employment relations with the client at the beginning of the legal relations Third, whether the client can take into a agency employee' service in changing one employment agency to another employment agency beyond the period of two years provided by the Act. Fourth, whether it can be regarded that the employment relations is directly established between the employee and the client at the beginning of the service, if the employment agency of a agency employee have been changed to another agency in appearance, but the employee is working in same workplace as before. Finally, if the section 6(3)(before repealed) can be applied, then, what is the legal nature of the employment contract between the agency employee and the client?
In conclusion, the direct employment relations should be established between the client and the agency employee. Because when a employment agency work is defined as unlawfulness, then, the agency employee can be protected for the purpose of the Act. And it can be allowed that the client make use a agency employee's service beyond the two years period in changing a employment agency for new one, if the Act have the purpose to maintain the job of the employee. Furthermore, the employment contract between the client and the agency employee under the section 6(3)(before repealed) can be regarded as a regular employment without a term. It is a reasonable interpretation for the purpose of the Act and the legal system.
- Files in This Item
- There are no files associated with this item.
- Appears in
Collections - ETC > 1. Journal Articles
Items in ScholarWorks are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.