Detailed Information

Cited 0 time in webofscience Cited 0 time in scopus
Metadata Downloads

Is the Alzheimer's Disease Assessment Scale-Cognitive Subscale Useful in Screening for Mild Cognitive Impairment and Alzheimer's Disease? A Systematic Review

Authors
Park, Seong-HiHan, Kuem Sun
Issue Date
2022
Publisher
BENTHAM SCIENCE PUBL LTD
Keywords
Alzheimer' s disease; cognitive dysfunction; older adults; neuropsychological tests; sensitivity; specificity; systematic review
Citation
CURRENT ALZHEIMER RESEARCH, v.19, no.3, pp.202 - 211
Indexed
SCIE
SCOPUS
Journal Title
CURRENT ALZHEIMER RESEARCH
Volume
19
Number
3
Start Page
202
End Page
211
URI
https://scholar.korea.ac.kr/handle/2021.sw.korea/143596
DOI
10.2174/1567205019666220404104854
ISSN
1567-2050
Abstract
Background: Mild cognitive impairment (MCI) and Alzheimer's disease (AD) are screened to distinguish whether the cognitive decline in older adults is attributed to pathological causes rather than normal aging. Objective: The purpose of this review was to analyze the diagnostic performance of the Alzheimer's Disease Assessment Scale-Cognitive Subscale (ADAS-Cog) in screening for MCI and AD. Methods: Electronic searches were performed on MEDLINE, EMBASE, CINAHL, and PsycArticles databases using the following keywords: dementia and ADAS-Cog. The Quality Assessment of Diagnostic Accuracy Studies-2 was used to check the risk of bias in the diagnostic studies. Results: We reviewed 14 studies, including 3,875 patients who met the selection criteria. In 2,624 MCI patients from nine studies, the pooled sensitivity of ADAS-Cog was 0.80 (95% confidence interval [CI], 0.68-0.88), the pooled specificity was 0.84 (95% CI, 0.75-0.90), and the area under the curve of summary receiver-operating characteristic curves (SROC AUC) was 0.89 (SE = 0.03). In 2,517 AD patients from 10 studies, the pooled sensitivity and pooled specificity were 0.91 (95% CI, 0.86-0.95) and 0.93 (95% CI, 0.88-0.95), respectively, and the sROC AUC was 0.97 (SE = 0.01). Although sub-analyzed according to age and years of education, there was no significant difference in the predictive validity of the ADAS-Cog. Conclusion: The ADAS-Cog has high predictive validity as a screening tool in both MCI and AD and has better diagnostic performance in patients with AD. When early screening for AD is desired, ADAS-Cog is a first-stage screening tool that can be initially employed.
Files in This Item
There are no files associated with this item.
Appears in
Collections
College of Nursing > Department of Nursing > 1. Journal Articles

qrcode

Items in ScholarWorks are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.

Related Researcher

Researcher HAN, Kuem Sun photo

HAN, Kuem Sun
간호대학 (간호학과)
Read more

Altmetrics

Total Views & Downloads

BROWSE