Improving the Quality of Response Surface Analysis of an Experiment for Coffee-supplemented Milk Beverage: II. Heterogeneous Third-order Models and Multi-response Optimization
- Authors
- Rheem, Sungsue; Rheem, Insoo; Oh, Sejong
- Issue Date
- 2019
- Publisher
- KOREAN SOC FOOD SCIENCE ANIMAL RESOURCES
- Keywords
- response surface methodology; central composite design; heterogeneous third-order model; multi-response optimization; desirability
- Citation
- FOOD SCIENCE OF ANIMAL RESOURCES, v.39, no.2, pp.222 - 228
- Indexed
- SCIE
SCOPUS
KCI
- Journal Title
- FOOD SCIENCE OF ANIMAL RESOURCES
- Volume
- 39
- Number
- 2
- Start Page
- 222
- End Page
- 228
- URI
- https://scholar.korea.ac.kr/handle/2021.sw.korea/68961
- DOI
- 10.5851/kosfa.2019.e17
- ISSN
- 2636-0772
- Abstract
- This research was motivated by our encounter with the situation where an optimization was done based on statistically non-significant models having poor fits. Such a situation took place in a research to optimize manufacturing conditions for improving storage stability of coffee-supplemented milk beverage by using response surface methodology, where two responses are Y-1=particle size and Y-2=zeta-potential, two factors are F-1=speed of primary homogenization (rpm) and F-2=concentration of emulsifier (%), and the optimization objective is to simultaneously minimize Y-1 and maximize Y-2. For response surface analysis, practically, the second-order polynomial model is almost solely used. But, there exists the cases in which the second-order model fails to provide a good fit, to which remedies are seldom known to researchers. Thus, as an alternative to a failed second-order model, we present the heterogeneous third-order model, which can be used when the experimental plan is a two-factor central composite design having -1, 0, and 1 as the coded levels of factors. And, for multi-response optimization, we suggest a modified desirability function technique. Using these two methods, we have obtained statistical models with improved fits and multi-response optimization results with the predictions better than those in the previous research. Our predicted optimum combination of conditions is (F-1, F-2)=(5,000, 0.295), which is different from the previous combination. This research is expected to help improve the quality of response surface analysis in experimental sciences including food science of animal resources.
- Files in This Item
- There are no files associated with this item.
- Appears in
Collections - Graduate School > Graduate School of Public Administration > 1. Journal Articles
Items in ScholarWorks are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.