Analysis of Simple Creep Stress Calculation Methods for Creep Life Assessment
- Authors
- Seo, Jun Min; Lee, Han Sang; Kim, Yun Jae
- Issue Date
- 8월-2017
- Publisher
- KOREAN SOC MECHANICAL ENGINEERS
- Keywords
- Creep Stress; M-a-Tangent Method(Ma-Tangent); ASME Code(ASME); R5 Code(R5)
- Citation
- TRANSACTIONS OF THE KOREAN SOCIETY OF MECHANICAL ENGINEERS A, v.41, no.8, pp.703 - 709
- Indexed
- SCOPUS
KCI
- Journal Title
- TRANSACTIONS OF THE KOREAN SOCIETY OF MECHANICAL ENGINEERS A
- Volume
- 41
- Number
- 8
- Start Page
- 703
- End Page
- 709
- URI
- https://scholar.korea.ac.kr/handle/2021.sw.korea/82724
- DOI
- 10.3795/KSME-A.2017.41.8.703
- ISSN
- 1226-4873
- Abstract
- Creep analysis takes much more time than elastic or elastic-plastic analysis. In this study, we conducted elastic and elastic-plastic analysis and compared the results with creep analysis results. In the elastic analysis, we used primary stress, which can be classified by the Ma-tangent method and stress intensities recommended in the ASME code. In the elastic-plastic analysis, we calculated the parameters recommended in the R5 code. For the FE models, a bending load, uniaxial load, and biaxial load were applied to the cross shaped welded plate, and a bending load and internal pressure were applied to the elbow pipe. To investigate the element size sensitivity, we conducted FE analysis for various element sizes for the cases where bending load was applied to the cross shaped welded plate. There was no significant difference between the creep stress and the alternative methods; however, in the Ma-tangent method, the results were affected by the element size.
- Files in This Item
- There are no files associated with this item.
- Appears in
Collections - College of Engineering > Department of Mechanical Engineering > 1. Journal Articles
Items in ScholarWorks are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.